In a message dated 5/8/05 4:52:53 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
archimedes-in-bayspringstel.net writes:
> Well, here's the problem with that: Both NANFA and NFC have some type of
> breeder program. NFC's was a little more agressive - they would send you
> any of
> the fish that were listed as available, and the recipient was supposed to
> send
> back data when they bred the fish. They sent a LOT of fish to a LOT of
> "breeders", and NOT ONE person returned a report of succeessful spawning.
>
>
As bad as I hate to admit it you do have a point,-in-one time I thought I
would be able to maintain several species but after being retired somewhat
unexpectedly I am down to breeding nothing but crayfish and I only have them because
they respond well to benign neglect. Most individuals simply do not have the
long term resources to maintain and breed a species in captivity with any
reliability.
moon
--part1_7e.69320a55.2fb0348e_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 5/8/05 4:52:53 P=
M Eastern Daylight Time, archimedes-in-bayspringstel.net writes:
Well, here's the problem with t= hat: Both NANFA and NFC have some type of
breeder program. NFC's was a little more agressive - they would send y= ou any of
the fish that were listed as available, and the recipient was supposed to se= nd
back data when they bred the fish. They sent a LOT of fish to a LOT of=
"breeders", and NOT ONE person returned a report of succeessful spawning.