Re: NANFA-- That whole sandbed thing.

njz (njz_at_clevelandmetroparks.com)
Sun, 2 Feb 2003 21:48:16 -0500

I know that there are people that do use the potting soil but I would be
concerned about all the other nutrients that would be liberated in the water
column, mostly phosphorous. My theory is, and I have no data yet to back it
up, that by adding this red art clay, you are limiting the nutrients and
adding primarily iron to the system. The stuff is incredibly cheap and I
would suspect that a little goes a long way. I believe that plant systems
are like reef systems, you want relatively nutrient poor water with only the
elements needed for the plants to grow. Too many nutrients can cause other
undesirable situations.

That is not to say that mushroom compost, potting soil, kitty litter, etc,
etc, etc, won't work. There's many ways to skin a cat.

And Todd, you are right, skeptical is a better word than critical. My
apologies.

Nick Zarlinga

"If we ignore nature.....maybe it'll go away."

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Bongiovanni" <bongi_at_cox-internet.com>
To: <nanfa_at_aquaria.net>
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 5:12 PM
Subject: re: NANFA-- That whole sandbed thing.

> Nick,
>
> I would think that a layer of potting clay would wind up going anaerobic
> at some point. I don't think that exotic
> materials are necessary for planted tanks. Diana Walstad states that
> there is sufficient Fe and other micro
> nutrients in soils that exotic materials such as Laterite, flourite,
> potting clays etc are unnecessary. You
> should be able to use the soil in your back yard! Or your neighbor's :-)
>
> My personal experience has been using two different sand stratas found
> near my home. One is white sand and the
> other is a sandy clay. These are from ancient beaches (you can even see
> bivalve imprints in the undisturbed
> sand!). These sands are considered nutrient poor but seem to provide
> sufficient micronurients for my experimental
> 10 gal planted tank. I initially had problems with green water, but
> water changes eventually took care of that.
> Really, not much different than any other tank, just normal cycling.
> The sand provides a nice substrate for
> plants with fine roots, like some of the aquatic grasses like Eleocharis
> spp. Since I added several shiners
> including on large Golden Shiner the tank has been a little out of
> balance. I have a low level of BBA growing but
> I have ignored it. I'm trying to see if I can find a way to achieve
> balance without having to resort to CO2
> injection etc because that is just too much work. 15 watts per 10 gal.
> http://briefcase.yahoo.com/bc/maxx8/
> lst?.dir=/Aquarium+Photos&.view=l click on the DCP_077 image. The top
> tank.
>
> My 55 has the CO2 inj, laterite, flourish suppliments, 3+ watts/gal
> florescent, etc. This tank requires weekly
> triming, I probably dump 5 lbs of plants a month.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 12:25:58 -0500, Nick Zarlinga
> <njz_at_clevelandmetroparks.com> wrote:
>
> Todd, what's your lighting like in these tanks. How about turbulence from
> filters etc? What kind of filtration, if any?
>
> I thought the purpose of the flourite was to provide nutrients to the
roots
> of the plants? With your set up, where will the nutrients come from if
the
> roots are below the flourite into the sand?
>
> I like your experimenting, but I am critical. Sounds like you have a
bunch
> of things going on and it might be hard to tell what is causing what. But
> then again, if the tank looks good, then I suppose it works?
>
> Keep up the experimenting, and let us know what you find.
>
> My interest is trying to get things going without the Flourite. I plan on
> playing with red art clay to be used as a gravel additive. I also am
> interested in getting some "live sand" from a stream and seeing what kind
of
> creepy crawlies a system can support. Then I would be curious to see how
> well fishes such as hog suckers do. It may be two different set ups but I
> will reason all that out when the time comes. All stuff we have talked
> about before.
>
> Nick Zarlinga
> Aquarium Biologist
> Cleveland Metroparks Zoo
> 216.661.6500 ext 4485
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanfa_at_aquaria.net On Behalf
> Of Todd Crail
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:59 PM
> To: nanfa_at_aquaria.net
> Subject: NANFA-- That whole sandbed thing.
>
>
> Greetings all...
>
> Well now that I'm 3 months into a sugar grained deep sandbed as substrate
> and have watched everything work as expected so far... I thought I'd get a
> picture and talk about it a bit. With certainty, the real meat of this
> discussion is about 1 year and 9 months down the road once any type of
> "honeymoon" is over with it, but maybe there are some who'd like to
> experiment with this now.
>
> http://www.farmertodd.com/freshwater/rainbowfish/SandbedLg.jpg
>
> That thar is a sandbed :) It's about 5" in the deeper sections (this is a
> normal 75 gallon). I bought the playsand at Home Depot for $2 a bag. 75
> gals of substrate for $6, when did you last pay that? :)
>
> Within the bed, I've mixed a bag of Seachem's flourite for extra root
> nutrition (the flourite will get your cost savings back tho ;). The
surface
> layer is all flourite and pea gravel. The bed slopes toward the back so
> that it's about even with the far left corner there (the 5" depth). I did
> this to create a grade from front to back so I could aquascape in some
> ornamental rocks and such. The intention is to only have about 1/2" to
3/4"
> of rocky material up top.
>
> Why is it like this still? I wanted to compare growth on different plants
> in different segments. Some in shallow gravel, some in deep gravel.
Let's
> just say those that hit the sand faster establish better and grow waaay
> faster. Some stuff on the deep gravel is still going as previously
> experienced... Super slow to withering. For example, I've always had
> trouble with val. Didn't matter the kind. Dunno why. I put it in sand
and
> there it goes. Same story with sagittaria. And all plants are forming
> super long roots (even bulbs like apongeton and nymphea? I have an
apongeton
> that's been in bloom on one stalk or another for a month now lol).
They're
> starting to make their way out to the edges so I can see how deep they're
> penetrating. It would be interesting to cut a hole in the foam insulation
I
> put underneath (my $3 solution to a $200 undergravel cable heater for
'warm
> feet' heh) and see where it's all at :)
>
> I do add fertilizers. I've been adding Sera's Florena for soluble iron
and
> micronutrients, potash for potassium and sulfur, and epsom salts for
> magnesium. I was doing this all before in a flourite only bed (which a
> flourite only bed is recommended at the lfs of course ;) and was not
> experiencing even a fraction of the success.
>
> There was one other change.. And that was putting glass tops in and
sealing
> up the gas exchange. I was not doing this prior (had it open top) and the
> additional CO2 is definately a factor... But remember... I'm getting the
> same sort of growth I had prior on the deeper gravel... So I kinda throw
> that out. At the same time, it's arguable that the respiration in the
sand
> is an additional CO2 source (no external CO2 source, even tho all the
> equipment is sitting right next to the tank lol). So it goes many ways.
It
> would be nice to be able to quantify things a little bit better.
>
> There have been other benefits as well. The water was transfered from
> another 75 when I did the tank move. Initial nitrate reading was ~50ppm.
> Pretty crappy huh? Once some plants had reestablished themselves, man the
> whole thing took off like wildfire. I haven't seen a nitrate in 2 months
> (weekly tests). I only did one 15 gal water change back in early November
> just because, well, "you're supposed to" but I haven't fussed with it
since.
> Just tested for nitrate to see how we're moving along. I've also only
> scrubbed the glass twice since this system's inception. Wow. Now I have
> all this time to take pictures :)
>
> Again, the jury is still out on wether the sand is denitrifying or the
> plants are able to absorb all ammonium and nitrate with their roots all
good
> and happy. In either case tho, together they're limiting algal growth and
> keeping the fish all happy. Oh, and the Farmer too :)
>
> So shortly when I go to set up the next native tank (gonna be another 75
> now... we'll see if it's back to the 125 next week ;) I'll pull off a
> majority of the top layer of the gravel as seed for the next tank. Then
> I'll aquascape as intended :)
>
> Same experience in the 30 gal native tank too, except that this sandbed is
> only 3" max due to the limited verticle tank space. And when I moved that
> sandbed a few weeks ago, I never even caught a whiff of sulfide. May be
too
> early to call that good tho ;)
>
> I've yet to work with benthos (bottom dwelling critters) to see who will
be
> beneficial and who will not. I'm going to work with that this summer
> outside in the yard so I don't violate my "3 tanks in house" ruling.
Should
> be interesting.
>
> So for now... To heck with all these rumors of black roots and room
choking
> sulfide nasties... The plants live in anaerobic substrates in the wild...
> Dunno why it'd be any different in a tank. Apparently all these authors
and
> 'experts' have never walked thru the muck huh? ;)
>
> And for a piece of shameless promotion for rainbowfish... check out the
rest
> of the pics at:
> http://www.farmertodd.com/freshwater/rainbowfish
>
> They're native if you're from Oz or PNG right? :)
>
> Night all... :)
> Todd
>
> I hope you know that this will go down on your permenant record.
> http://www.farmertodd.com
> --
> /"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
> / reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
> / Association"
> / This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes
> Association
> / nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
> / subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
> / nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to
> / nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead.
> / For more information about NANFA, visit our web page,
http://www.nanfa.org
> ----
> /"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
> / reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
> / Association"
> / This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes
> Association
> / nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
> / subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
> / nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to
> / nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead.
> / For more information about NANFA, visit our web page,
http://www.nanfa.org

--
> /"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
> / reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
> / Association"
> / This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes
Association
> / nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
> / subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
> / nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to
> / nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead.
> / For more information about NANFA, visit our web page,
http://www.nanfa.org
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
/"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association"
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes Association
/ nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
/ subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
/ nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to
/ nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead.
/ For more information about NANFA, visit our web page, http://www.nanfa.org