Re: NANFA-- News: GloFish in the news

Sajjad Lateef (sajjadlateef_at_yahoo.com)
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:00:01 -0800 (PST)

--- Moontanman_at_aol.com wrote:
> couldn't survive. would you consider such fish that looked the same
> but were modified to stay small?

Naturally small due to lack of naturally produced growth hormone,
then fine. Small due to selective breeding, then NO.

=====

-- 
Sajjad Lateef   e-mail: sajjad_at_acm.org 
Note: Any e-mail to me with my first name in Subject  or
without a subject line is automatically filtered out 
and discarded as  s p a m .
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
/"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association"
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes Association
/ nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
/ subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
/ nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to
/ nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead.
/ For more information about NANFA, visit our web page, http://www.nanfa.org