The contention that the main problem the Topeka Shiner has is with
introduced species strikes a cord with my limited observations. Thanks for
the info.
Mark Otnes
Fargo ND
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hoover, Jan J ERDC-EL-MS" <HOOVERJ_at_wes.army.mil>
To: <nanfa_at_aquaria.net>
Cc: <adamsr_at_siu.edu>; <killgore at wes.army.mil>
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:45 PM
Subject: NANFA-- Topeka shiner decline and FW jelly expansion
> Two very interesting articles in the June 2002 issue of Journal of
> Freshwater Ecology:
>
> "Spatial and temporal species associations with the Topeka shiner(Notropis
> topeka)in Missouri," by Matthew R. Winston. This article uses fish data
> from 1938 to present to look at changes in distribution. Topeka shiner
> declined (along with 6 other species) and were negatively associated with
> three expanding species: blackstripe topminnow, bluegill, and largemouth
> bass. Unlike other declining species, Topekas retreated to smaller,
> high-gradient streams. Results did not support physical/chemical causes
for
> Topeka declines (e.g., agriculture, urbanization, sedimentation,
> channelization, etc.) but suggested biotic causes (e.g., predation,
> competition, introduced diseases).
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
/"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association"
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes Association
/ nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
/ subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
/ nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to
/ nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead.
/ For more information about NANFA, visit our web page, http://www.nanfa.org