> Uh, two things. The lecturing here has little relevance to native fishes.
> And second, it's my opinion that the lecturing here has little relevance to
> native fishes. If I needed this kind of cranking I'd just waste my time and
> listen to AM radio. Thank you.
>
> --Bruce Stallsmith
Bruce, do you really believe human-caused habitat degradation isn't currently
the most important single issue pertaining to fishes' futures? And that
taxation is as effective or more so than regulation in promoting "land use"?
Steffen isn't the only one offended by your comments. Shall I disparage public
radio or public tv to "balance" your unfair slur of AM radio? Thank you.
Bruce Scott
Meridian, Idaho
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
/"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association"
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes Association
/ nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
/ subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
/ nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to
/ nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead.
/ For more information about NANFA, visit our web page, http://www.nanfa.org