Re: NANFA-- Re: Environment down the tubes

Robert Carillio (darterman_at_cboss.com)
Tue, 19 Nov 2002 09:29:41 -0600

Todd...this makes good sense to me, what you say... Something else that
comes to mind... There are also spaces like brownfields which can be used
for what you describe below. Another alternative energy source is, as I'm
sure we all have heard of, is "tapping" into the ground to harness the
heating powers of magma. In areas where volcanic activity takes place, this
is being used right now. I have to look up which cities actually
participate, though. A few islands in the Carribean.... I'll get back to you
on that. This is still an evolving idea, though..... While it seems that
no energy source is without "side effects", it's just a matter of trying
to achieve the use of something that has the least overall impact on the
what sustains us.

Rob

> When was anyone in support of wind and solar energy talking about
converting
> natural ecosystems? There's plenty of land that has already been
converted to
> human use that could be multipurpose, and should at least be given a
chance to
> see how far it can go. I mean really, what does the roof on your house do
> besides reflect and waste sun energy? That space has already had its
biomass
> displaced. Might as well use those before arguing to start converting
> currently UNALTERED natural spaces designated as "reserves" and
"preserves"
> sheesh. :)
>
> The most beautiful piece of human altered land that I've seen was in the
hills
> surrounding Oakland, California. While this once was a fantastic piece of
the
> native floristic province, it had been trashed with mining and erurasian
> grasses for cattle. But it was currently being used for both cattle and
wind
> energy and neither seemed bothered that the other was happening in the
same
> place. That farmer actually might be making money...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey Fullerton
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 2:36 AM
> To: nanfa_at_aquaria.net
> Subject: NANFA-- Re: Environment down the tubes
>
> biomass, solar and wind require more space for production-
> which means more land must be altered that could otherwise support a
> natural ecosystem.

--
> /"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
> / reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
> / Association"
> / This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes
Association
> / nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
> / subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
> / nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to
> / nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead.
> / For more information about NANFA, visit our web page,
http://www.nanfa.org
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
/"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association"
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes Association
/ nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
/ subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
/ nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to
/ nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead.
/ For more information about NANFA, visit our web page, http://www.nanfa.org