You wrote:
> The Shute's (CFI) are doing some really neat stuff, some of which I agree with
>(reintroduction of E. monacha, N. flavipinnis, and N. baileyi into Abrams
>Creek), and some of which I don't (reintroduction of E. cinereum into the
>middle Tennessee River).
Why don't you agree with the reintroduction of E. cinereum?
I'm not challenging you; I'm just unfamiliar with the case. For that matter, why
do you agree with the other introductions? I'm just curious to learn what makes
for a good & bad introduction.
Thanks,
Chris Scharpf
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
/"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association"
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes Association
/ nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
/ subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
/ nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to
/ nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead.
/ For more information about NANFA, visit our web page, http://www.nanfa.org