Re: NANFA-L-- Follow-Up On Alabama Turtle Poaching Arrests

Bruce Stallsmith (fundulus-in-hotmail.com)
Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:22:43 -0400

That's true. But by definition an endangered species has a small population,
so the taking of any individuals has a large effect. I suspect the perps
plead guilty in exchange for light penalties.

--Bruce Stallsmith
along the turtle-rch Tennessee (still)
Huntsville, AL, US of A

>From: Moontanman-in-aol.com
>Reply-To: nanfa-l-in-nanfa.org
>To: nanfa-l-in-nanfa.org
>Subject: Re: NANFA-L-- Follow-Up On Alabama Turtle Poaching Arrests
>Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:21:20 EDT
>
>Has everyone forgotten that only a small percentage of the turtles involved
>were taken illegally? I made that point when the original post came out
>that it
>was slanted to make it look like all the turtles taken were illegal. While
>I
>don't agree with the taking of endangered turtles from the wild lets
>remember
>that only a small number of turtles involved in this case were indeed
>illegal.
>Possibly that is why the fines were so low?
>
>Michael

/-----------------------------------------------------------------------
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association (NANFA). Comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of NANFA. For more information about NANFA,
/ visit http://www.nanfa.org Please make sure all posts to nanfa-l are
/ consistent with the guidelines as per
/ http://www.nanfa.org/guidelines.shtml To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get
/ help, visit the NANFA email list home page and archive at
/ http://www.nanfa.org/email.shtml