>From: Moontanman-in-aol.com
>Date: Fri May 19 11:35:07 CDT 2006
>To: nanfa-l-in-nanfa.org
>Subject: Re: NANFA-L-- Re: Re: NANFA-L-- Old story, new twist? Old twist new story. Pl...
>In a message dated 5/19/2006 12:08:59 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>bockhouse1-in-verizon.net writes:
>
>Bringing fish from one watershed to another is a big gamble, and often works
>out badly, whether the fish is endangered or common. If a species is foreign
>to a watershed, then the potential for harm to that watershed is real. The
>fact that it has been done in the past is no justification for doing it in the
> future.
>
>
>
>
>Show me some data were a fish was released on purpose by knowledgeable
>people where it turned out badly or where it turned out good or where it had any
>effect-in-all.
>
>
>Michael Hissom
>aurea mediocritas
>/-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes
>/ Association (NANFA). Comments made on this list do not necessarily
>/ reflect the beliefs or goals of NANFA. For more information about NANFA,
>/ visit http://www.nanfa.org Please make sure all posts to nanfa-l are
>/ consistent with the guidelines as per
>/ http://www.nanfa.org/guidelines.shtml To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get
>/ help, visit the NANFA email list home page and archive at
>/ http://www.nanfa.org/email.shtml
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association (NANFA). Comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of NANFA. For more information about NANFA,
/ visit http://www.nanfa.org Please make sure all posts to nanfa-l are
/ consistent with the guidelines as per
/ http://www.nanfa.org/guidelines.shtml To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get
/ help, visit the NANFA email list home page and archive at
/ http://www.nanfa.org/email.shtml