Even with sexual species, arguments can be made to define species as
individuals who share a recent common pattern of descent as a primary
determinant rather than considering only where and when sex takes place.
This is, of course, the core cladistic argument, and with tropical beetles,
say, if you have a recent collection of thousands of individuals
representing small grades of difference, you can assign species based on
physical traits without spending several lifetimes ascertaining details of
sexual patterns. (Yes, I'm talking about Willi Hennig here...)
--Bruce Stallsmith
a buncha species in the Tennessee
Huntsville, AL, US of A
>From: Irate Mormon <archimedes at bayspringstel.net>
>Reply-To: nanfa-l at nanfa.org
>To: "nanfa-l at nanfa.org" <nanfa-l at nanfa.org>
>Subject: Re: NANFA-L-- Moribund fish & Life Outside
>Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 22:13:30 -0400
>
>Quoting Bruce Stallsmith <fundulus at hotmail.com>:
>
> > Different species concepts apply to different organisms.
>
>I don't understand - how can that be?
>
>--Irate
>
>"You can stop kicking this dead whale down the beach and find another hobby
>horse to beat to death."
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association (NANFA). Comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of NANFA. For more information about NANFA,
/ visit http://www.nanfa.org Please make sure all posts to nanfa-l are
/ consistent with the guidelines as per
/ http://www.nanfa.org/guidelines.shtml To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get
/ help, visit the NANFA email list home page and archive at
/ http://www.nanfa.org/email.shtml