Re: NANFA-- More on Species-Area Relations (SARs)

Bruce Stallsmith (fundulus_at_hotmail.com)
Sun, 24 Dec 2000 13:44:28 -0500

<x-flowed>
>I have a question I would like to ask the group about species and niches.
>Basically what I have on my mind is this, In any given habitat is species
>diversity limited by ecological niches or by the ability of the genera that
>lives there to adapt to available niches? Or is the number of occupied
>niches
>a factor of time between catastrophic events that wipe the slate clean or
>at
>least cut down on species? I ask this because of the differences in fish
>populations in different areas of the globe. It seems that in some areas
>niches are filled that are blank in other areas. Any one have comments on
>this?
>
>Moon

Moon, you cut to the heart of the study of biodiversity. It seems that one
could answer with a qualified "yes, sometimes" to most of your questions. An
area like the Tennessee Valley has a high diversity because the
geomorphology seems to have been stable for at least 70 million years or
more, with no glaciations to disrupt existing communities. The same analysis
can be made of many tropical areas, especially in southeast Asia, which have
been continuously tropical for over 200 million years. This kind of
stability seems to facilitate speciation through adaptive radiation, i.e.
filling (and creating?) ecological niches.

My question about rainbow darters in Maryland several weeks ago is a smaller
scale example of these dynamics. As Dave Neely pointed out, many Atlantic
drainage streams are relatively depauperate of species like darters. These
streams run basically west to east, and during the last several glaciations
became sub-Arctic for periods of time. There was no way for fishes to easily
retreat south ahead of the glaciers, so either they adapted or more likely
were extirpated. These streams would be slow to be recolonized, because fish
need direct water connections for easiest recolonization. If these streams
ran north-south, recolonization would probably be faster. A lot of plants on
the eastern seaboard had an easier time, because they were able to retreat
south ahead of the ice and survive in Georgia or Florida and then move north
again.

--Bruce Stallsmith
Huntsville, AL

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
/"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association"
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes Association
/ nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
/ subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
/ nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to
/ nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead.
/ For more information about NANFA, visit our web page, http://www.nanfa.org
</x-flowed>