Re: NANFA-- Bush puts hold on "dead zone" plan

Bob Bock (bockhouse_at_earthlink.net)
Sat, 3 Feb 2001 17:07:33 -0500

Well, the private enteprise approach works for the nature conservancy. I
think you've made a good point here.
----- Original Message -----
From: <Noturus_at_aol.com>
To: <nanfa_at_aquaria.net>
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: NANFA-- Bush puts hold on "dead zone" plan

> In a message dated 2/3/01 1:23:30 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> tcmajorr_at_westol.com writes:
>
> << And maybe those environmentalists ought to give up counter-productive
> lawsuits and consider a more constructive approach. Instead of giving
> their sweat and treasure to line the pockets of lawyers and politicians
> why don't they put their efforts into promoting alternative
> technologies- start companies and non-profit organizations that help low
> income people and struggling small farmers implement eco-friendly
> technologies that could improve their lot economically as well as ease
> their impact on the local ecosystem as well as mittigate the cumulative
> impact further downstream. An approach like Habitat for Humanity funded
> by private donation and employing volunteer labor. Could do everything
> from building water troughs and planting stream buffers to creating
> artificial wetlands that filter barnyard waste.
> >>
> Jeff, I like and agree with this comment [though not necassarily the other
> ones you made :)]. I have been a part of several project such as
> this....organized and funded in-part by the Feds, I might add! These are
> on-going efforts to involve local landowners to help protect fish and
aquatic
> habitats on their property. The Feds provide funding for fencing, wells
etc.
> The landowners are often doing this in hopes that a species can be
protected
> without listing it. One of the biggest problems in situations like this is
> when environmental groups sue the FWS to list the species and designate
> critical habitat. The landowners catch wind of this and invaribly pull
out.
> If this happens, they then blame the FWS for listing the fish ("you lied t
o
> us and said we could do this without listing the fish!") and pretty much,
> everyone looses. Sometimes it takes years to develop trust and cultivate a
> cooperative atmosphere with a community. Then sombody hauls in a lawyer
from
> the "Big City" and it all goes to hell.
>
> I guess what I'm trying to say is that it's unfair to point fingers at any
> one group or organization, and the Feds are not always the bad guys!
>
> J.R.
>
>
/---------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
> /"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
> / reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
> / Association"
> / This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes
Association
> / nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
> / subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
> / nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to
> / nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead.
> / For more information about NANFA, visit our web page,
http://www.nanfa.org
>

/----------------------------------------------------------------------------- /"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily / reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes / Association" / This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes Association / nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word / subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to / nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to / nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead. / For more information about NANFA, visit our web page, http://www.nanfa.org