Why not muskyminnow, or barracuda minnow? Don't you think a common name
should have regional significance, or at least morphological significance
on a greater scale than comparing a species to another species (or in this
case GENUS to species!)? To correct this blunder, I think the northern
pike's name should be changed to "non-musky, non-pickerel esocid with the
body shape of the fish formerly known as the squawfish".
-- Jay DeLong Olympia, WA
/----------------------------------------------------------------------------- /"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily / reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes / Association" / This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes Association / nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word / subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to / nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to / nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead. / For more information about NANFA, visit our web page, http://www.nanfa.org </x-flowed>