Re: NANFA-- Columbia trip gear

Todd Crail (farmertodd_at_buckeye-express.com)
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:43:10 -0500

No argument Steffen, these are good _reasons_ when paired with the law, not
rationalizations. :)

I was specifically addressing the notion of collection because:
"But theeey do it tooooo!"

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steffen Hellner" <steffen_at_hellner.biz>
To: <nanfa_at_aquaria.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: NANFA-- Columbia trip gear

> I think there is truth in both aspects. Surely an animal taken from the
wild
> has no value for its population anymore directly. Indirectly it can help
> saving it by backing it up before a species or population is extinct. Of
> course, again, the target must be to preserve the species in the wild. But
> not solely.
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
/"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association"
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes Association
/ nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
/ subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
/ nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to
/ nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead.
/ For more information about NANFA, visit our web page, http://www.nanfa.org