Re: NANFA-- Re: TRADING POST

EELReprah_at_aol.com
Fri, 5 Nov 1999 08:21:31 EST

In a message dated 11/5/99 8:21:29 AM, fraulels_at_minet.ca writes:

<< I hold to the AKA style interest in
local populations, avoidance of inbreeding etc., and I'm still
maintaining my fish. >>

This dichotomy of purpose still leave me somewhat confused. It is accepted by
most people that a population (whatever that means) be kept "pure," yet
genetic diversity is applauded. Isn't this a contradiction in terms? It seems
to me that it is sort of like the difference between a mutt and a carefully
selected hybrid. Certainly in the horticultural world, hybrids are supreme.
In the guppy world, there certainly is selective breeding, not genetic
diversity. Culling in nature is ruthless and extensive. In the aquarium,
culling is less ruthless and different criteria are imposed -- color, size,
finnage rather than speed, camouflage, reproductive capability, etc.

Lee Harper

/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
/"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association"
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes Association
/ nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
/ subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
/ nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to
/ nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead.
/ For more information about NANFA, visit our web page, http://www.nanfa.org