In most states they would have lost every vehicle and piece of equipment
used to catch or transport the illegal turtles and the property used to
store the them.
Either Alabama has some really backwards laws or the story was incomplete.
Drummond Howard
Gaithersburg, Maryland
>From: dlmcneely-in-lunet.edu
>Reply-To: nanfa-l-in-nanfa.org
>To: nanfa-l-in-nanfa.org
>Subject: Re: NANFA-L-- Follow-Up On Alabama Turtle Poaching Arrests
>Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:31:18 -0500
>
>Moon, I can't help responding to this. Some of the turtles taken were
>snappers, and the data on the posting certainly made me think the
>poachers were targeting snappers.
>
>Suppose I walk into a bank, make a withdrawal from my account of
>several tens of thousands of dollars, which is in the account, is mine,
>and it is legal to withdraw. Then, as I pocket the money, I point a
>pistol-in-the clerk, and demand more money, this time the bank's and
>its other depositors' money. I leave with the money I withdrew, and
>with a couple of thousand more that I robbed for.
>
>Should I get a light sentence because much of the money I took from the
>bank was legal for me to take?
>
>Dave
>
>David L. McNeely, Ph.D., Professor of Biology
>Langston University; P.O. Box 1500
>Langston, OK 73050; email: dlmcneely-in-lunet.edu
>telephone: (405) 466-6025; fax: 405) 466-3307
>home page http://www.lunet.edu/mcneely/index.htm
>
>"Where are we going?" "I don't know, are we there yet?"
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Moontanman-in-aol.com
>Date: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 1:21 pm
>Subject: Re: NANFA-L-- Follow-Up On Alabama Turtle Poaching Arrests
> > Has everyone forgotten that only a small percentage of the turtles
> > involved
> > were taken illegally? I made that point when the original post
> > came out that it
> > was slanted to make it look like all the turtles taken were
> > illegal. While I
> > don't agree with the taking of endangered turtles from the wild
> > lets remember
> > that only a small number of turtles involved in this case were
> > indeed illegal.
> > Possibly that is why the fines were so low?
> >
> > Michael
> >
>/-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes
>/ Association (NANFA). Comments made on this list do not necessarily
>/ reflect the beliefs or goals of NANFA. For more information about NANFA,
>/ visit http://www.nanfa.org Please make sure all posts to nanfa-l are
>/ consistent with the guidelines as per
>/ http://www.nanfa.org/guidelines.shtml To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get
>/ help, visit the NANFA email list home page and archive at
>/ http://www.nanfa.org/email.shtml
>
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association (NANFA). Comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of NANFA. For more information about NANFA,
/ visit http://www.nanfa.org Please make sure all posts to nanfa-l are
/ consistent with the guidelines as per
/ http://www.nanfa.org/guidelines.shtml To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get
/ help, visit the NANFA email list home page and archive at
/ http://www.nanfa.org/email.shtml