Regarding the arguement against catching and responsibly keeping the alien species the
round goby:
One arguement is that they may escape even though one may be responsible due to
life's general chaos. As illustrated by Dave's story about the idiot who released all
those reptiles despite being told not to. And we've probably all come across people
like that. But, with that in mind, are there not several varieties of fish and what not
commonly in the aquarium trade that are just as dangerous? We all know about Florida
and the Apple Snail as well as many other fish and aquatic plants they got infested
everywhere. And of course aquatic plants are a big problem all over the country.
Particularly with the popularity of ponds. So, assuming that there are several fish in
the commercial trade as dangerous (are there? I just assume there are), then is saying
that one must not touch the same as saying one must not keep any common aquarium fish?
if not, why not?
And of course since the laws are quite clear about this particular fish it makes this
question mute, but as a theoretical question regarding fish in general I'd be interested
in hearing more discussion and opinions on it.
thanks,
-derek parr
central NC
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association (NANFA). Comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of NANFA. For more information about NANFA,
/ visit http://www.nanfa.org Please make sure all posts to nanfa-l are
/ consistent with the guidelines as per
/ http://www.nanfa.org/guidelines.shtml To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get
/ help, visit the NANFA email list home page and archive at
/ http://www.nanfa.org/email.shtml