> I didn't realize
> that NANFA was for professionals or academics only? - intent on forcing
> e-communication to be according to a strict protocol with accompanying
> threats of enforcement.
This is one of two disturbing trends I have noticed within the past year or so.
At one time, I believed that this was the direction I wanted NANFA to go in.
You know, better credibility, etc. - but now I realize I was wrong. I
understand that not everyone is interested in my explorations of ethics and
politics, but hey - if we can't talk about things that impact our hobby on this
list, then where _is_ it appropriate?
--Irate
Charter member, DNRC
"Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; if it dies there, no constitution,
no law, no court can save it."
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
/"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association"
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes Association
/ nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
/ subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
/ nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to
/ nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead.
/ For more information about NANFA, visit our web page, http://www.nanfa.org