There is nothing inherently wrong with this. The AKA does an excellent job
publishing the Journal of the AKA, and publishes a series of important
publications such as the Killifish Master Index. Could the AKA do more? As
an AKA member I would say so, but in truth this is largely dependent on
members doing it after proposing and developing ideas. And maybe tropical
hobbyists on average don't as directly feel the brunt of habitat destruction
in distant ecosystems; the waters we're interested in are literally in our
neighborhoods.
As with the ALA, I don't think NANFA has a crisis of too much money!
--Bruce Stallsmith
AKA #4192
Huntsville, AL
>From: "William Allen jr." <billandbonnie_at_peoplepc.com>
>Reply-To: nanfa_at_aquaria.net
>To: <nanfa_at_aquaria.net>
>Subject: Re: NANFA-- Fw: AKA Convention
>Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 19:41:35 -0700
>
>Not the ALA - we don't get no respect. Where do they get their $$$$$?
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
/"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association"
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes Association
/ nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
/ subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
/ nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to
/ nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead.
/ For more information about NANFA, visit our web page, http://www.nanfa.org